| POSSIBLE ANSWERS | CHANCE | TODAY |
| 88.7%/ 100.0% | (closed) | |
| 0.5%/ 0.0% | (closed) | |
| 0.7%/ 0.0% | (closed) | |
| 0.7%/ 0.0% | (closed) | |
| 0.7%/ 0.0% | (closed) | |
| 0.7%/ 0.0% | (closed) | |
| 0.7%/ 0.0% | (closed) | |
| 0.7%/ 0.0% | (closed) | |
| 0.5%/ 0.0% | (closed) | |
| 0.7%/ 0.0% | (closed) | |
| 0.7%/ 0.0% | (closed) | |
| 0.7%/ 0.0% | (closed) | |
| 0.5%/ 0.0% | (closed) | |
| 0.7%/ 0.0% | (closed) | |
| 2.5%/ 0.0% | (closed) | |
| 0.6%/ 0.0% | (closed) |
This question was popular when I first published it, about 3 months ago. So, I thought I’d give it another go, with updated ranges. As Yogi Berra is said to have opined, “the future ain’t what it used to be!”
It’s amazing how much some of these prices have shifted in only 3 months!
Here are the remarks that went with the original version:
My source of information will be the Wall Street Journal Market Data page. They give plenty of detail, historical ranges, charts, and so on; the whole process will be very transparent.
http://online.wsj.com/mdc/page/marketsdata.html
I realize that not all of these ranges are exactly symmetric, and that some of these instruments are more volatile than others; yet, this is Inkling not real life! And, even in real life, historical statistics do not always help to predict the future!
I am leaving the market open for 2 years, but expect that it will close before then. If not, I will extend it.
I use the word “go” instead of “close” advisedly. Since we are dealing with instruments that are traded across many time zones, the concept of “close” is really not operational. In the event that one of these boundaries is crossed, I do not expect it to be controversial; again, the WSJ will be the arbiter.