Favorite stock: aapl
If you just meant “Will it be proven by the end of 2008?” as I assumed when I made my trades, you need to cash it out. The year is now 2009, and if Riemann’s Hypothesis had been proven, it would have made big headlines.
So, for example, I’m also invested in the Google X Prize market—much more heavily than in this market, in fact. Just now I was considering moving my money from that market to this one. Since they both pay $1/day, the moon shot one is capped at ~$2300/share, while this one is capped at ~$4400/share with the payout twice as far off, they look comparable. But investing today, I would make 4.8x with the moon shot, vs. 6.9x with this one—not a favorable comparison; even with a linear investment one would expect this market to pay off at twice the rate for twice the time.
Morever, let’s say that the moon shot never happens, so I make my 4.8x on my current investment, with the return coming in 2015. By that time, it’s reasonable to expect another, similar market to exist with a similar payoff ratio. But then, for the remaining 5 years until the amendment market pays off, I’ll expect a return of (5/6)*4.8 = 4.0x (it’s 5/6 the time, and I’m assuming payoff increases linearly with time), for a total return on today’s investment of 4.8*4.0 = 19.2×. I would triple my money compared to if I had invested in this market instead.
What if the moon shot does happen, so that I don’t get the full 4.8x? Well, I get my money back sooner, and I can reinvest it sooner. I don’t make as much on that single investment, but I’ll probably make more in the end.
I like the idea of markets like this, because I don’t want to come to this site every day to churn short-term investments, and because I like a sure thing; a stock like this should be almost the equivalent of a government bond, with a low return but high security. But even government bonds have exponential returns, and will beat out anything linear in the long run.